Poster Presentation Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Annual Scientific Meeting 2019

Metastatic acral melanoma treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (#197)

Kenneth Cho 1 2 3 , Anne Cust 1 4 , Yun Megan Foo 2 , Guy Eslick 1
  1. University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  2. Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
  3. University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
  4. Melanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, NSW, Australia

Aim

Melanomas that typically arise on sun-shielded skin are classified by their anatomical location as acral melanoma (AM). These rare melanomas more commonly affect patients of darker skin, and have different aetiological mechanisms and somatic mutation signatures compared to other cutaneous melanomas. The treatment response of systemic therapy for AM is unclear. The current study systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the existing data in the literature regarding the treatment response of AM.

Methods

Five electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception to June 2019, identifying all studies that reported treatment responses of metastatic AM and ALM. Data were independently extracted by two investigators according to predefined clinical endpoints. We used a Random-effects model for data analysis based on event rates (ER) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Ten studies, with 215 patients, met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Average complete response probabilities were ER: 9% (95% CI 4%-18%, I2 = 0.00% p <0.001), partial response ER: 19% (95% CI 12%-29%, I2 = 0.00% p < 0.001), stable disease ER: 35% (95% CI 20%-54%, I2 = 51.94% p = 0.1) and progression of disease ER: 42% (95% CI 26%-59%, I2 = 45.36% p 0.34). Subgroup analysis of patients receiving immunotherapy compared to chronic sun damaged skin and mucosal melanoma will be presented.

Conclusions

Overall patients with metastatic acral melanoma had significant rates of treatment response to systemic therapy.