Poster Presentation Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Annual Scientific Meeting 2019

AL-study – A pilot study of Traditional Chinese Herbal medicines Astragalus membranaceus and Ligustrum lucidum in people with advanced malignancy (#343)

Thi TD Pham 1 , Bhagwant K Sekon 2 , Lili Truong 3 , Andrew J McLachlan 4 , Philip Beale 3
  1. Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, Australia
  2. The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  3. Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, Australia
  4. Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Background: Astragalus membranaceus and Ligustrum lucidum (AL) has been widely used in traditional Chinese medicine in adjunct to standard anti-cancer therapies.

Aim: Investigate the safety and tolerability of AL and effect on inflammation, QOL and immune function in patients with advance malignancies.

Method: This open-label prospective observational pilot study (ACTRN 12615001203549)1 recruited patients with recurrent or metastatic malignancies not on chemotherapy to receive 6 capsules twice daily of AL (Zhenqi Fuzheng Capsules, Gansu Fuzheng Pharmaceuticals, equivalent to 25 g of native drug) for 12 weeks. Patients were assessed at weeks 3, 6, 9 and 12 for safety and tolerability. Secondary outcomes included changes in inflammatory and immunological markers, QOL (FACT-G, FACT-F and GHQ scores) and disease progression.

Results: Of the 25 patients enrolled, 96% had stage IV disease. 17(68%) patients completed 12 weeks; 47% of these patients continued further. Physician’s assessment found 84% had tolerated the treatment well after 12 weeks. Lack of therapeutic effect was the reason for cessation in 80%; 4 ceased due to adverse events (AE). 75% had proven disease progression at week 12. 89.1% of AEs were grade 1 or 2 and majority were gastrointestinal (52.5%). Three developed venous thromboembolism and one with known liver metastases developed hepatic derangement. Tumour markers overall remained stable over 12 weeks while 5 had downtrending markers. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio was unchanged ((mean ± SEM) 3.4 ± 0.4 baseline, 5.0 ± 1.6 week 12). Regulatory T cells, measuring immunological response, did not change (4.6 ± 0.7 baseline, 4.1 ± 0.6 week 12).  No significant differences were found in QOL scores in FACT-G (-5.1 ±6.8), FACT-F (-1.7 ± 6.5) or GHQ (0.1±1.7).

Conclusion: AL was well tolerated and most AEs were mild with no significant impact on inflammatory or tumour markers or disease progression. QOL remained stable. This pilot study could inform an RCT.

  1. Sekhon BK et al. Int J Clin Trials 2017;4(3):111-115